This research conducted a quantitative analysis of survey data collected from coaches and student-athletes at Gov. Felicisimo T. San Luis Integrated Senior High School. The focus was to explore how different coaching styles impact attitudes toward gender diversity and the level of gender awareness among both groups. The goal was to evaluate how coaching methods affect inclusivity and the relationship between gender awareness and coaching styles. The findings revealed a varied demographic profile among participants, characterized by seasoned coaches (average age of 36, predominantly female, with 6 to 10 years of experience and holding masters degrees) and youthful athletes (largely aged 18-20, predominantly in Grade 12), indicating a dynamic interaction between the two groups. Coaches rated all their styles as effective, with scores ranging from 3.41 to 3.70, highlighting democratic (M=3.70) and transformational (M=3.62) styles as particularly effective in fostering empowerment, motivation, holistic development, and inclusivity. In contrast, while transactional (M=3.55), autocratic (M=3.51), and laissez-faire (M=3.41) styles were perceived as effective for providing structure, they raised concerns related to creativity, autonomy, and the consistency of support necessary for inclusive settings. Gender diversity awareness was consistently rated as Moderately Utilized (mean scores ranging from 3.39 to 3.67) by both coaches and athletes. This indicates a high level of awareness about diversity but reveals a gap in participation regarding training and advocacy efforts, thus underlining the necessity for continued professional development. The statistical analysis showed no notable differences between coaches and athletes in their views on the effects of coaching styles or awareness of gender diversity, suggesting a shared understanding between the two groups. However, a significant correlation (p < 0.01) was found between the influence of coaching and awareness of gender diversity, confirming that inclusive coaching practices positively relate to greater sensitivity toward gender issues. Multiple regression analysis indicated that while eight predictors combined explained 85% of the variance in athletes attitudes toward gender diversity, no single predictor stood out as independently significant. In summary, this study underscores the vital importance of inclusive coaching approaches, particularly democratic and transformational leadership styles, in cultivating positive attitudes toward gender diversity in sports. It advocates for enhanced education and training on gender inclusivity for both coaches and athletes, providing insightful considerations for sports educators, administrators, and policymakers working towards more equitable and inclusive athletic environments.