Education
Volume: 149 , Issue: 1 , May Published Date: 25 May 2024
Publisher Name: IJRP
Views: 301 , Download: 188 , Pages: 622 - 666
DOI: 10.47119/IJRP1001491520246529
Publisher Name: IJRP
Views: 301 , Download: 188 , Pages: 622 - 666
DOI: 10.47119/IJRP1001491520246529
Authors
# | Author Name |
---|---|
1 | Leah P. Mendiola |
Abstract
This study is about the awareness of teachers through leadership, strategies and responsiveness of school head in the context of school improvement plan. It involved ten (10) sub offices, 252 teacher-respondents of Cluster 2 in the Division of Laguna who provided the information needed in this study, such as the level of school head leadership, strategies, and responsiveness on the implementation of school improvement plan teachers awareness of the components of school improvement plan discussion of the significant relationship between school head leadership and teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan significant relationship between school head strategies and teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan significant relationship between the school heads responsiveness and teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan lastly discussion of the significant relationship as predictors between school head leadership, strategies, responsiveness, and teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan. The following were the significant findings of the investigation. Furthermore, based on the data that was presented, examined, and interpreted, it was discovered that the degree of school head leadership, strategies, and responsiveness were all highly evident. Similarly, the level of teachers awareness on the components of school improvement plan was very highly evident. While the school head leadership, strategies and responsiveness were all significantly correlated to teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan. Furthermore, the p-values obtained were less than the significance alpha 0.05, hence there is a significance. Based on the findings, the following conclusions were drawn. There is a relationship between school head leadership, strategies, responsiveness, and teachers awareness on the implementation of school improvement plan. Hence, the hypotheses stated were all rejected. Lastly, according to the foregoing findings and conclusion, the following recommendations are made. With regards to the school improvement plan, school heads should create a good team for school improvement for the best result together with educators should generate projects to reach out marginalized students. Also suggested the involvement of stakeholders to ensure community commitment and engagement. Lastly, future researchers should have a wide area of investigation to determine the possible level of awareness of teachers on the implementation of school improvement plan in other places.