This study aims to determine the school administrators leadership style and teachers performance. Specifically, it seeks to answer the following: (1) the leadership style of school administrators in terms of Visionary, Coaching, Affiliative, Democratic, Pacesetting, and Coercive, (2) the level of teachers performance among the one hundred seventeen (117) teachers in East 2 District, Division of Gingoog City for the School Year 2021-2022, and (3) the significant relationship between the school administrators leadership style and the level of teachers performance. Frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were used to ascertain the school administrators leadership styles and teachers performance. The research instrument was modified and developed by Judgement Index (2018) and the Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) SY 2021-2022. Spearman rho was used to establish if a significant relationship exists between the school administrators leadership styles and teachers performance. Most of the teachers are rated Very Satisfactory in their IPCRF. School administrators always practice commanding and affiliative styles of leadership. Pacesetting, democratic, and coaching styles of leadership were perceived as often practiced by school heads. There is a strong correlation between the school administrators leadership styles with the teachers performance. Thus, school administrators should be open to opportunities that would allow improvement in their leadership and management styles which cater to the needs of teachers and learners in the school.

Leadership Styles

Teachers' Performance