ABSTRACT Criminal cases often involve not only properties but also human?s lives. A way to trace these cases, the police carry out an investigation which will take to the court. In the process of investigating cases involving the life of a person, investigators generally consult expert?s assistance, such as doctors in the form of a statement called Visum et Repertum. Making Visum et repertum, an examination report on criminal victims, both living and dead ones, is one of the services provided by general practitioners and forensic medicine who can assist law enforcers in enforcing justice. Visum et repertum is a written statement from a general practitioner (in his capacity as an expert) or a forensic specialist at the official request of law enforcement authorities about what is seen and found in the examined object under an oath. This research is a descriptive study with a cross sectional approach which aims to determine the quality of the Visum et Repertum of live victims of injury cases at RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang Kisaran dated from 1st October 2018 to 31st May 2019, which was conducted at RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang Kisaran from June 2020 to July 2020. The population in this study were all Visum et Repetum data at RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang Kisaran from 1st October 2018 to 31st May 2019. The samples of this study are all data from Visum et Repetum of live victims of injury cases that meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria by total sampling method. Based on the research obtained from post mortem et repertum data of injuries at RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang from 1st October 2018 to 31st May 2019, it can be concluded that: the number of cases of wounded live victims examined by doctors were as many as 25 cases. The quality of the Visum et Repertum for the injuries of living victims at RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang from 1st October 2018 to 31st May 2019, the VER quality of the preliminary injury was 60% which was moderate. The quality of the VER for injuries to the news section of 45%, which was not good. The quality of the VER for injuries to the conclusion of 25%, which was not good. The quality of the VER for injuries of 34.6%, which was not good. Based on the results of this study, it is suggested that Hospital leaders must be aware that Visum et Repertum is a valid document of evidence in lieu of evidence. To be able to make a good visum et repertum, it is necessary to conduct training / workshops for emergency room doctors of RSUD H. Abdul Manan Simatupang Kisaran regarding making visum et repertum.

Visum et Repertum

Quality

Injury cases