Business Studies

Business Studies

Enablers, Customers Results casual relation in the EFQM excellence model. An empirical study on Banking Sector of Sudan

Pages: 14  ,  Volume: 38  ,  Issue: 1 , October   2019
Received: 11 Oct 2019  ,  Published: 14 October 2019
Views: 33  ,  Download: 16

Authors

# Author Name
1 Mohamed Eltahir Eltayeb

Abstract

Abstract – Most of TQM literature is discussing the customer satisfaction as one of the corner stone in the process of achieving excellence in business and as one of the main indicators of performance improvement. The aim of this paper is studying customers’ satisfaction in terms of EFQM enablers (Leadership, Strategy, People, partnerships and resources, Processes) and customers’ results, by evaluating the causal relation between the enablers set and the Customers result in the EFQM model, with an empirical study on the Banking Sector of Sudan.

Design/Approach/Methodology-The approach, methodology and design of the study Present   deep understanding of the associations between the EFQM enablers customer result, by examining this hypothetical causal relationship, a survey via questionnaire conducted on 30 Banks in Sudan provide the dada of the research examination.

Findings – The enablers side (Leadership, Strategy, People, partnerships and resources, Processes, products and services) has significant contribution to the customer results except employees. The casual relation between the enablers and customer result in the EFQM model with in the Banking sector of Sudan found significantly positive except the employees as enabler element.

Research limitations/implications – This research results based only on the data collected from Sudanese firms (Banks). Other countries or other sectors researches are possible related future research opportunities. The logical extension to this research is to examine the casual relation between the rest of the enablers’ elements and the results elements sides of the EFQM model in different environments.  

Practical Implications – understanding the casual relation between the enabler side of the EFQM model which contained five elements (Leadership, Strategy, People, partnerships and resources, Processes) and the customers results which located on the result side of the model will provide a guide for proper implementation for the EFQM model and possibly facilitating the application of TQM systems. 

Originality/Value – During the last five decades customers’ expectations and needs became top priority of any business, hence organizations seeking their survival in the market grant an advance position to their customers. This study add additional value for understanding organization customers relations in terms of providing deep insight for the causal relation of the organization as represented in the EFQM model at the enabler Side of the model and the customer results on the results side of the model. Taking banking sector of Sudan as an empirical examination environment for this causal relation. 

  Key Words Customers Satisfaction , Casual relation, Business Excellence ,  European foundation for quality management, Business Excellence.

Paper type Research paper.

Keywords

  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Business Excellence
  • References

    References:

    Andreassen, T.W. and Lervik, L. (1999), “Perceived relative attractiveness today and tomorrow as predictors of future repurchase intention”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 164-72.

     

    Banks Information Bulletin, Volume 46 / January  December 2018, Union of Sudanese Banks,  Sinan printing press .

     

    Black, S.A. and Crumley, H.C. (1997), “Self-assessment: what’s in it for us?”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 8 Nos. 2/3, pp. S90-4.

     

    Becker, S.W. (1993), "TQM does work: ten reasons why misguided attempts fail", Management Review, Vol. 85 No. 5, pp. 31-33.

     

    Bernhardt K.L. and Kennett N.P. (1994), "The relationship Between Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Longitudinal Analysis", Department of Marketing, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

     

    Bitner (1990), “Evaluation service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and complaint reports”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 69-82.

     

    Dale, B.G. (1997), “Characterictics of organizations not committed to total quality management”,

    Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 21, pp. 377-84.

     

    Danaher, P.J. (1997), “Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service

    attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 73 No. 2,

    pp. 235-60.

     

    Dow,  D.,  Samson,  D.  and  Ford,  S.  (1999),  “Exploding  the  myth:  do  all  quality  management practices   contribute   to   superior   quality   performance?”,   Production   and   Operations Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-27.

     

    Dijkstra, L. (1997), “An empirical interpretation of the EFQM framework”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 321-41.

     

    EFQM. (2013). The EFQM Excellence Model. Retrieved from: www.efqm.org.  EFQM: Home. EFQM [online]. 2018 [cit. 2018-11-13]. Retrieved from:http://www.efqm.org/en/

     

    Eklof, J.A. and Westlund, A. (1998), "Customer satisfaction index and its role in quality

    management", Total Quality Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-27.

     

    Eskildsen, J.K. and Kanji, G.K. (1998), “Identifying the vital few using the European foundation for quality management model”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 9 No. 4/5, pp. S92-5.

     

    Eskildsen, J.K. and Dahlgaard, J.J. (2000), “A causal model for employee satisfaction”, TotalQuality Management, Vol. 11 No. 8, pp. 1081-94

     

    Esquildsen,  J.K.,  Kristensen,  K.  and  Juhl,  H.J.  (2001),  “The  criterion  weights  of  the  EFQM Excellence  Model”,  International  Journal  of  Quality  &  Reliability  Management,  Vol.  18 No. 8, pp. 783-95.

     

     

    European Foundation for Quality Management (1999), EFQM Model for Business Excellence: Company Guidelines.

     

    GADD, K.W.,1995. Business self-assessment. A strategic tool for building process robustness and achieving integrated management. Business Process Re-engineering & Management

    Journal. 1(3), 66-85.

     

    Ghobadian, A. and Gallear, D.N. (1996), "Total quality management in SMEs.", The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 83-106.

     

    Ghobadian, A. and Woo, H.S. (1996), “Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 10-44.

     

    Headley, D.E. and Miller, S.J. (1993), “Measuring service quality and its relationship to future consumer behavior”, Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 32-41.

     

    Ian Brace, 2004 QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN, HOW TO PLAN, STRUCTURE AND WRITE SURVEY MATERIAL FOR EFFECTIVE MARKET RESEARCH. kogan-page. London.

     

    JACKSON, S., 1999. Exploring the Possible Reasons Why the UK Government Commended the EFQM Excellence Model as the Framework for Delivering Governance in the new NHS. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 12(6), 244-253.

     

    Johnson, M.D., Gustafson, A., Andreassen, T.W., Lervik, L. and Cha, J. (2001), “The evolution andfuture of national customer satisfaction indices”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 217-45.

     

    Karatepe, O., Yavas, U. and Babakus, E. (2005), “Measuring service quality of banks: scale

    development and validation”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 12 No. 5,

    pp. 373-83.

     

    KANJI, G.K. and TAMBI, A.M., 2002. Business Excellence in Higher Education. Chichester:

    Kingsham Press.

     

    McADAM, R. and WELSH, W., 2000. A critical review of the business excellence model applied to further education colleges. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(3), 120-130.

     

     

     

    McGee, J.E. (1993), “The convergence of total quality and work design”, Journal of Quality & Participation, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 90-6.

     

    Moeller, J., Breinlinger-O’Reilly, J. and Elser, J. (2000), “Quality management in german health care-The EFQM Excellence Model”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 254-8.

     

    Naumann, E., Jackson, D.W. Jr. and Rosenbaum, M.S. (2001), "How to implement a customer

    satisfaction program", Business Horizons, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 177-207.

     

    Naylor, G. (1999), “Using the business excellence model to develop a strategy for a healthcare organisation”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 37-44.

     

    Prabhu, V., Appleby, A., Yarrow, D. and Mitchell, E. (2000), “The impact of ISO 9000 and TQM

     

    Porter, L. J. and Tanner, S.J., 1996. Assessing Business Excellence. Oxford: Butterworth-

    Heinemann.

     

    Reiner, G. (2002), “Analysis critical factors of company success based on the EFQM Excellence Model”, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress for Total Quality Management, Verona (Italy)Vol. 2, pp. 361-6.

     

    Sekaran, U. and R . B (2016).Research methods for business/ a skill – building approach. Seven Edition . Chichister , West Sussex ,UK. DDC 650.072-dc23 LC.

     

    SHERGOLD K. and REED, D.M., 1996. Striving for excellence: how self-assessment using the Business Excellence Model can result in step improvements in all areas of business activity. The TQM Magazine 8(6), 48-52.

     

    Sjoblom,  L.  (1995),  “An  analysis  of  quality  management  practices  –  technical  tools  and management leadership”, Quality Management Journal, pp. 26-36, Winter.

     

    STEVEN K. THOMPSON, 2012 Simon Fraser University, Sampling Third Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

     

    Weatlund, A.H. (2001), “Measuring environmental impact on society in the EFQM system”, Total

     

    Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1996), “The behavioral consequences of service quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 31-46.