This study was conducted to determine the validity of the Araling Panlipunan 2 instructional materials. Specifically, it sought answers to the following statements (1) Determine the level of validity of learning materials in terms of their components as to (1.1) Learning Objectives, (1.2) Content, (1.3) Enhancement Activities, and (1.4) Application (2) Determine the level of validity of learning materials in terms of its characteristics as to (2.1) Creativeness, (2.2) Accuracy and (2.3) Usefulness. (3) Determine the significant difference in the level of its components and characteristics as rated by the teacher and master teachers. Descriptive design was utilized to analyze the data systematically. A survey and a research- made questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale were used in the study. Weighted mean and standard deviation were used for the descriptive questions, while a two-sample T-test was used for the inferential questions. In accordance with the findings, the conclusions were made. The study revealed that the level of learning materials in terms of its components gathered a learning objective, contents, enhancement activities, and application were very high. This means that the components of learning material in Araling Panlipunan 2 were evident. And as to the level of learning materials in terms of its characteristics as to creativeness, accuracy, usefulness was very high. This means that the characteristics of learning material in Araling Panlipunan 2 were evident. On the other hand, the learning objectives, content, and application, the association among these variables revealed a not significant analysis of difference, which means that the master teacher and teachers' perception of the learning materials. However, when it comes to enhancement activities, it gathered a p-value which showcase a significant analysis that indicates a significant difference in the master teacher and teacher evaluation of the learning material. Therefore, the hypothesis is partially accepted, stating that there is no significant difference in the level of validity of learning materials in terms of learning objectives, content and application. On the other hand, the enhancement activities show significant difference as evaluated by the master teachers and teachers in Araling Panlipunan. This recommends teachers to continue creating and developing learning materials that would manifest good learning objectives, quality content, engaging enhancement activities, and meaningful application.

usefulness

validity

learning material

Creativeness

application

content

accuracy